references
According to research from the National Institute of Justice, investigators have been able to reexamine cold cases involving older or deteriorated evidence because to advancements in DNA technology. These advancements make it possible to examine data that before might not have yielded meaningful findings.
But forensic science needs to be applied with caution. According to research by Gerald M. Laporte (2017), erroneous interpretations, deceptive testimony, and forensic misconduct have all led to erroneous convictions. This illustrates the importance of appropriate training, adherence to scientific norms, and precise evidence analysis.
These results underline how crucial it is to increase forensic science education and give students chances to hone their investigative skills.
1. Laporte, G. M. (2017). Wrongful convictions and DNA exonerations: Understanding the role of forensic science. NIJ Journal, 279. https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/wrongful-convictions-and-dna-exonerations-understanding-role-forensic-science
2. National Institute of Justice. (n.d.). Cold case investigations. https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/law-enforcement/investigations/cold-case-investigations
3. National Institute of Justice. (2004). Education and training in forensic science: A guide for forensic science laboratories, educational institutions, and students.
4. National Institute of Justice. (2002). Using DNA to solve cold cases: Special report.
5. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (n.d.). Forensic science. https://www.nist.gov/forensic-science
Create Your Own Website With Webador